世界牙科技术



ONLINE SERVICES
客服热线
请点击企业QQ咨询

欢迎咨询订阅《世界牙科技术》

微信二维码

微信二维码
0
首页 > 网上书店 > 2021年6月第五期口腔综合版
前往购买本期杂志,或者关注微信公众号:
idpc1997
上一篇:无 下一篇:无
借助咬合前导功能性矫正装置和颌位矫正弹簧(SUS2)治疗安氏 II 错𬌗 —一对同卵双胞胎的比较研究

前往购买本期杂志,或者关注微信公众号:
idpc1997
上一篇:无 下一篇:无

参考文献

1.Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: Estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13:97–106.

2. McNamara JA Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981;51: 177–202. 

3. Kucukkeles N, Ilhan I, Orgun IA. Treatment efficiency in skeletal class II patients treated with the jasper jumper. Angle Orthod 2007;77:449–456. 

4. Sander FG, Wichelhaus A. Skelettale und dentale Veränderungen bei der Anwendung der Vorschubdoppelplatte. Ein kephalometrischer Vergleich zu einer unbehandelten Klasse II-Gruppe [Skeletal and dental changes during the use of the bite-jumping plate. A cephalometric comparison with an untreated class-II group]. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1995;56:127–139. 

5. Fischbach H, Kahl-Nieke B. A retrospective evaluation of the treatment of skeletal class-II with removable appliances. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1995;56:140–147. 

6. Lisson JA, Tränkmann J. Effects of angle class II, division 1 treatment with jumping-the-bite appliances. A longitudinal study. J Orofac Orthop 2002;63:14–25. 

7. Sander FG, Lassak C. Die Beeinflussung des Wachstums mit der Vorschubdoppelplatte im Vergleich zu anderen funktionskieferorthopädischen Geräten [The modification of growth with the jumping-the-bite plate compared to other functional orthodontic appliances]. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1990;51:155–164. 

8. Heinig N, Goz G. Clinical application and effects of the forsus spring. A study of a new herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop 2001;62:436–450. 

9. Franchi L, Alvetro L, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Defraia E, Baccetti T. Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the forsus fatigue resistant device in class II patients. Angle Orthod 2011;81:678–683. 

10. Herrera FS, Henriques JF, Janson G, Francisconi MF, de Freitas KM. Cephalometric evaluation in different phases of jasper jumper therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e77–84. 

11. Lisson JA, Tränkmann J. Treatment begin and treatment effect in functional orthodontics with jumping-the-bite appliances. J Orofac Orthop 2003;64:341–351. 

12. Ricketts RM. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod 1960;46:330–357. 

13. Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972;62:339–383. 

14. Lundström A. Nature versus nurture in dento-facial variation. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:77–91. 

15. Kawala B, Antoszewska J, Necka A. Genetics or environment? A twin-method study of malocclusions. World J Orthod 2007;8:405–410. 

16. Chhibber A, Upadhyay M, Uribe F, Nanda R. Long-term surgical versus functional class II correction: A comparison of identical twins. Angle Orthod 2015;85:142–156. 

17. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL. Treatment of identical twins with frankel and herbst appliances: A comparison of results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103: 131–137. 

18. Oztoprak MO, Nalbantgil D, Uyanlar A, Arun T. A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with sabbagh universal spring (SUS2) and forsus FRD appliances. Eur J Dent 2012;6:302–310. 

19. Bilgic F, Basaran G, Hamamci O. Comparison of forsus FRD EZ and andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:445–451. 

20. Pacha MM, Fleming PS, Johal A. A comparison of the efficacy of fixed versus removable functional appliances in children with class II malocclusion: A systematic review.  Eur J Orthod 2016;38:621–630.

21. Dalci O, Altug AT, Memikoglu UT. Treatment effects of a twin-force bite corrector versus an activator in comparison with an untreated class II sample: A preliminary report. Aust Orthod J 2014;30:45–53. 

22. Hanoun A, Al-Jewair TS, Tabbaa S, Allaymouni MA, Preston CB. A comparison of the treatment effects of the forsus fatigue resistance device and the twin block appliance in patients with class II malocclusions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2014;6:57–63. 

23. Mahamad IK, Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, Husain A. A comparision of twin-block and forsus (FRD) functional appliance – a cephalometric study. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 2012;23:49–58. 

24. Tarvade SM, Chaudhari CV, Daokar SG, Biday SS, Ramkrishna S, Handa AS. Dentoskeletal comparison of changes seen in class II cases treated by twin block and forsus. J Int Oral Health 2014;6:27–31. 

25. Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, Masucci C, Defraia E, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance vs the forsus fatigue resistant device in growing class II patients. Angle Orthod 2015; 85:784–789. 26. Schaefer AT, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T. A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the twinblock and stainless steel crown herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:7–15. 

27. O‘Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O‘Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I. Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the herbst or twin-block appliances: A randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:128–137. 

28. Baysal A, Uysal T. Dentoskeletal effects of twin block and herbst appliances in patients with class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:164–172. 

29. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the herbst and frankel appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134–144. 

30. Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37:418–434. 31. Perinetti G, Primozic J, Furlani G, Franchi L, Contardo L. Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances alone or in combination with multibracket appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod 2015;85:480–492. 32. Perinetti G, Primozic J, Franchi L, Contardo L. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in pre-pubertal and pubertal class II patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0141198. 

33. Frye L, Diedrich PR, Kinzinger GS. Class II treatment with fixed functional orthodontic appliances before and after the pubertal growth peak – a cephalometric study to evaluate differential therapeutic effects. J Orofac Orthop 2009;70:511–527. 

34. Chhibber A, Upadhyay M, Uribe F, Nanda R. Mechanism of class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with twin force bite corrector. Angle Orthod 2013;83:718–727. 

35. Lisson JA. Einsatz von Doppelvorschubplatten (DVP) bei funktionskieferorthopädischer Behandlung [Use of jumping-the-bite appliances during functional orthodontic treatment]. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2012;44:163–171.




全部评论(0)


暂无评论

E-Mail:
请输入邮箱