联
系
客
服
系
客
服
扫码留言
1. Ekelund JA, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: A prospective study on Branemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:602–608.
2. Esposito M, Murray-Curtis L, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD003815.
3. Filippi A, Higginbottom FL, Lambrecht T, et al. A prospective noninterven- tional study to document implant success and survival of the Straumann Bone Level SLActive dental implant in daily dental practice. Quintessence Int 2013;44:499–512.
4. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:601–602.
5. da Silva RJ, Issa JP, Semprini M, et al. Clinical feasibility of mandibular implant overdenture retainers submitted to immediate load. Gerodontology 2011;28:227–232.
6. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl):92–109.
7. Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, van’t Hof MA, Geertman ME, Kalk W. Bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res 1998;77:1832–1839.
8. Awad MA, Locker D, Korner-Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra- oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000;79:1659–1663.
9. Hug S, Mantokoudis D, Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of 3 overdenture concepts with tooth roots and implants: 2-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:236–243.
1. Mumcu E, Bilhan H, Geckili O. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers. Gerodontology 2012;29:e618–e623.
2. Hlatky MA. Patient preferences and clinical guidelines. J Am Med Assoc 1995;273:1219–1220.
3. van der Weijden T, Legare F, Boivin A, et al. How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol. Implement Sci 2010;2:5–10.
4. Feine JS, Awad MA, Lund JP. The impact of patient preference on the design and interpretation of clinical trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:70–74.
5. Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS. Patient satisfaction with man- dibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:467–473.
6. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van’t Hof MA. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: A 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Int J Oral Maxil- lofac Implants 2003;18:879–885.
7. Komiyama A, Klinge B, Hultin M. Treatment outcome of immediately loaded implants installed in edentulous jaws following computer-assisted virtual treatment planning and flapless surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 677–685.
8. Sato FR, Asprino L, de Araujo DE, de Moraes M. Short-term outcome of post- operative patient recovery perception after surgical removal of third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1083–1091.
9. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M, Blanchet E. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:298–304.
10. Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L, Kois D, Hujoel P. Minimally invasive flapless implant placement: Follow-up results from a multicenter study. J Periodontol 2009;80:347–352.
11. Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Krainhofner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: A 3-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:164–170.
12. Blanco J, Nunez, V, Aracil L, Munoz F, Ramos I. Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog: Flap versus flapless surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:640–648.
13. Nkenke E, Eitner S, Radespiel-Troger M, Vairaktaris E, Neukam FW, Fenner M. Patient-centred outcomes comparing transmucosal implant placement with an open approach in the maxilla: A prospective, non-randomized pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:197–203.
14. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145–151.
15. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non- submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi- center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161–172.
16. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients’ satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:185–193.
17. Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, et al. E.A.O. Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of War- saw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1243–1253.
18. van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blomback U, et al. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless sur- gery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: A prospec- tive multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(Suppl 1):111–120.
19. Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa- supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: Surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:980–988.
20. Komiyama A, Pettersson A, Hultin M, Näsström K, Klinge B. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching ap- proach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:308–313.
21. Hämmerle CH, Stone P, Jung RE, Kapos T, Brodala N. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding computer-assisted implant dentistry. In J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl):126-131.
22. D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:321–335.
23. Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Lazza A, et al. Implant-retained mandibular overden- tures with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:495–501.
24. Cordaro L, Mirisola di Torresanto V, Petricevic N, Roig Jornet P, Torsello F. Sin- gle unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibu- lar overdentures supported by four implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1130–1136.
25. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: A 10-year clin- ical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:722–728.
26. de Souza JG, Neto AR, Filho GS, Dalago HR, de Souza Júnior JM, Bianchini MA. Impact of local and systemic factors on additional peri-implant bone loss. Quintessence Int 2013;44:415–424.
27. Cosgarea R, Dannewitz B, Sculean A, et al. Bacterial and inflammatory behav- ior of implants in the early healing phase of chronic periodontitis. Quintes- sence Int 2012;43:491–501.
28. Maló P, Rigolizzo M, Nobre Md, Lopes A, Agliardi E. Clinical outcomes in the presence and absence of keratinized mucosa in mandibular guided implant surgeries: a pilot study with a proposal for the modification of the technique. Quintessence Int 2013;44:149–157.
Broadala N. Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl):118
暂无评论
请选择购买类型
已成功加入购物车
