联
系
客
服
系
客
服
扫码留言
1. Gambarini G, Gerosa R, de Luca M, Garala M, Testarelli L. Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel- titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:798–800.
2. Al-Sudani D, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature. J Endod 2012;38:987–989.
3. Sakkir N, Thaha KA, Nair MG, Joseph S, Christalin R. Management of dilacerated and S-shaped root canals – An endodontist’s challenge. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:22–24.
4. Shahnaz N, Khalid A, Aijaz H, Ashraf BI, Shah AF. Manage- ment of a maxillary second premolar with an S-shaped root canal – An endodontic challenge. IAIM 2015;2:213–217.
5. Ajuz NC, Armada L, Goncalves LS, Debelian G, Siqueira JF Jr. Glide path preparation in S-shaped canals with rotary pathfinding nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2013;39:534–537.
6. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, technique and means. Endod Topics 2005;10:30–76.
7. Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, et al. Bending proper- ties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J Endod 2011;37:1293–1295.
8. Shim KS, Oh S, Kum K, Kim YC, Jee KK, Chang SW. Mech- anical and metallurgical properties of various nickel-titani- um rotary instruments. BioMed Res Int 2017;2017:1–13.
9. Braga LCM, Silva ACF, Buono VTL, de Azevedo Bahia MG. Impact of heat treatments on the fatigue resistance of dif- ferent rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2014; 40:1494–1497.
10. Al-Sudani D. Topographic analysis of HyFlex controlled memory nickel-titanium files. J Int Oral Health 2014;6: 1–4.
11. Alazemi MA, Bryant ST, Dummer PMH. Deformation of HyFlex CM instruments and their shape recovery follow- ing heat sterilization. Int Endod J 2015;48:593–601.
12. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomech- anical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2013;39:163–172.
13. Dagna A, Gastaldo G, Beltrami R, Chiesa M, Poggio C. F360 and F6 Skytaper: SEM evaluation of cleaning effi- ciency. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2015;69–74.
14. Schäfer E, Oitzinger M. Cutting efficiency of five differ- ent types of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2008;34:198–200.
15. Saber SEDM, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evalu- ation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015;48:131–136.
16. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2006;39:203–212.
17. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s statement on p-val- ues: Context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 2016;70: 129–131.
18. Ersev H, Yilmaz B, Çiftçioglu E, Özkarsli SF. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instru- ments in simulated S-shaped canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e86–e93.
19. Bartols A. Bewertung verschiedener Aufbereitungstech- niken bei s-förmig gekrümmten Wurzelkanalmodellen [thesis] [in German]. Greifswald: University of Greifswald, 2008:148.
20. Ceyhanli KT, Kamaci A, Taner M, Erdilek N, Celik D. Shaping ability of two M-wire and two traditional nickel- titanium instrumentation systems in S-shaped resin canals. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:713–717.
21. Weine FS. Endodontic therapy, ed 5. St Louis:Mosby Elsevier, 2006.
22. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: Effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 2000;26: 210–216.
23. Maia Filho EM, dos Reis Santos RM, Lima DM, et al. Shaping ability of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Recip- roc in simulated root canals. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17:902–906.
24. Özyürek T, Yilmaz K, Uslu G. Shaping ability of Reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 2017;43:805–809.
25. Bonaccorso A, Cantatore G, Condorelli GG, Schäfer E, Tripi TR. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rota- ry instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 2009;35:883–886.
26. Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod 2014;40:852–856.
27. Donnermeyer D, Viedenz A, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Impact of new cross-sectional designs on the shaping ability of rotary NiTi instruments in S-shaped canals. Odontology 2020;108:174–179.
28. Ayyad N, Saleh ARM. Comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instru- mentation systems in simulated canals. J Int Dent Med Res 2019;12:22–30.
29. Wu H, Peng C, Bai Y, Hu X, Wang L, Li C. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:1–7.
30. Sieraski SM, Taylor GN, Kohn RA. Identification and endodontic management of three-canalled maxillary pre- molars. J Endod 1989;15:29–32.
31. Yilmaz A. Shaping Ability of Two Rotary Nickel-Titanium Systems in Simulated Canals. Conference: The 20th Scien- tific Congress of Asian Pacific Endodontic Confederation & The 14th International Congress of Turkish Endodontic Society 2019.
32. Keskin C, Sariyilmaz E, Demiral M. Shaping ability of Reciproc Blue reciprocating instruments with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2018;12:63–67.
33. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of the mechanical be- haviour of PathFile and ProGlider pathfinding nickel-tita- nium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2015;48:894–901.
34. Troiano G, Dioguardi M, Cocco A, Zhurakivska K, Cia- varella D, Muzio LL. Increase in the glyde path diameter improves the centering ability of F6 Skytaper. Eur J Dent 2018;12:89–93.
35. Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E. New thermo- mechanically treated NiTi alloys – a review. Int Endod J 2018;51:1088–1103.
36. Bürklein S, Jäger PG, Schäfer E. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J 2017; 50:983–990.
37. Morgental RD, Vier-Pelisser FV, Kopper PM, de Figuei- redo JA, Peters OA. Cutting efficiency of conventional and martensitic nickel-titanium instruments for coronal flaring. J Endod 2013;39:1634–1638.
38. Lopes HP, Vieira VTL, Moreira EJL, et al. Effects of elec- tropolishing surface treatment on cyclic fatigue resistance of BioRace nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2010;36:1653–1657.
39. Gambarini G, Plotino G, Grande NM, Al-Sudani D, de 41. Lim KC, Webber J. The validity of simulated root canals Luca M, Testarelli L. Mechanical properties of nickel- titanium rotary instruments produced with a new manu- facturing technique. Int Endod J 2011;44:337–341.
40. Baumann MA, Roth A. Effect of experience on quality of canal preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod1999;88:714–718.
41.Lim KC, Webber J. The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J 1985;18:240–246.
42.Cui Z, Wei Z, Du M, Yan P, Jiang H. Shaping ability of ProTaper Next compared with WaveOne in late-mod-el three-dimensional printed teeth. BMC Oral Health 2018;18:115.
暂无评论
请选择购买类型
已成功加入购物车
