联
系
客
服
系
客
服
扫码留言
1. Puleo, D.A.; Nanci, A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 2311–2321. [CrossRef]
2. Davies, J.E. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J. Dent. Educ. 2003, 67, 932–949. [CrossRef]
3. Pattanaik, B.; Pawar, S.; Pattanaik, S. Biocompatible implant surface treatments. Indian J. Dent. Res. Off. Publ. Indian Soc. Dent. Res.2012, 23, 398–406. [CrossRef]
4. Le Guehennec, L.; Soueidan, A.; Layrolle, P.; Amouriq, Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent. Mater. Off. Publ. Acad. Dent. Mater. 2007, 23, 844–854. [CrossRef]
5. Yeo, I.S.; Han, J.S.; Yang, J.H. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2008, 87, 303–311. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Shayganpour, A.; Rebaudi, A.; Cortella, P.; Diaspro, A.; Salerno, M. Electrochemical coating of dental implants with anodic porous titania for enhanced osteointegration. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 2183–2192. [CrossRef]
7. Binahmed, A.; Stoykewych, A.; Hussain, A.; Love, B.; Pruthi, V. Long-term follow-up of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants–a clinical trial. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2007, 22, 963–968.
8. Heimann, R.B. Osseoconductive and Corrosion-Inhibiting Plasma-Sprayed Calcium Phosphate Coatings for Metallic Medical Implants. Metals 2017, 7, 468. [CrossRef]
9. Cook, S.D.; Baffes, G.C.; Wolfe, M.W.; Palafox, A.J. A comparison of femoral and mandibular animal models for the evaluation of HA-coated implants. J. Oral Implantol. 1992, 18, 359–365.
10. Eom, T.G.; Jeon, G.R.; Jeong, C.M.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, S.G.; Cho, I.H.; Cho, Y.S.; Oh, J.S. Experimental study of bone response to hydroxyapatite coating implants: Bone-implant contact and removal torque test. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2012, 114, 411–418. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Weinlaender, M.; Kenney, E.B.; Lekovic, V.; Beumer, J., 3rd; Moy, P.K.; Lewis, S. Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types of endosseous dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1992, 7, 491–496.
12. Orenstein, I.H.; Tarnow, D.P.; Morris, H.F.; Ochi, S. Three-year post-placement survival of implants mobile at placement. Ann. Periodontol. 2000, 5, 32–41. [CrossRef]
13. Lee, J.J.; Rouhfar, L.; Beirne, O.R. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: A meta-analytic review. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2000, 58, 1372–1379. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Jeffcoat, M.; McGlumphy, E.; Reddy, M.; Geurs, N.; M Proskin, H. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2003, 18, 406–410. [CrossRef]
15. Yang, C.Y.; Lee, T.M.; Yang, C.W.; Chen, L.R.; Wu, M.C.; Lui, T.S. In vitro and in vivo biological responses of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings with posthydrothermal treatment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2007, 83, 263–271. [CrossRef]
16. Roy, M.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S. Induction Plasma Sprayed Nano Hydroxyapatite Coatings on Titanium for Orthopaedic and Dental Implants. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 205, 2785–2792. [CrossRef]
17. Ferguson, S.J.; Broggini, N.; Wieland, M.; de Wild, M.; Rupp, F.; Geis-Gerstorfer, J.; Cochran, D.L.; Buser, D. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2006, 78, 291–297. [CrossRef]
18. Buser, D.; Broggini, N.; Wieland, M.; Schenk, R.K.; Denzer, A.J.; Cochran, D.L.; Hoffmann, B.; Lussi, A.; Steinemann, S.G. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J. Dent. Res. 2004, 83, 529–533. [CrossRef]
19. Sammons, R.L.; Lumbikanonda, N.; Gross, M.; Cantzler, P. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2005, 16, 657–666. [CrossRef]
20. Bornstein, M.M.; Valderrama, P.; Jones, A.A.; Wilson, T.G.; Seibl, R.; Cochran, D.L. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: A histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2008, 19, 233–241. [CrossRef]
21. Schwarz, F.; Herten, M.; Sager, M.; Wieland, M.; Dard, M.; Becker, J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2007, 18, 481–488. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Abdel-Haq, J.; Karabuda, C.Z.; Arisan, V.; Mutlu, Z.; Kurkcu, M. Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand-blasted acid-etched implant: An experimental pilot study in sheep. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2011, 22, 265–274. [CrossRef]
23. Bacchelli, B.; Giavaresi, G.; Franchi, M.; Martini, D.; De Pasquale, V.; Trire, A.; Fini, M.; Giardino, R.; Ruggeri, A. Influence of a zirconia sandblasting treated surface on peri-implant bone healing: An experimental study in sheep. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 2246–2257. [CrossRef]
24. Franchi, M.; Bacchelli, B.; Giavaresi, G.; De Pasquale, V.; Martini, D.; Fini, M.; Giardino, R.; Ruggeri, A. Influence of different implant surfaces on peri-implant osteogenesis: Histomorphometric analysis in sheep. J. Periodontol. 2007, 78, 879–888. [CrossRef]
25. Pearce, A.I.; Richards, R.G.; Milz, S.; Schneider, E.; Pearce, S.G. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: A review.Eur. Cell Mater. 2007, 13, 1–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Nafei, A.; Danielsen, C.C.; Linde, F.; Hvid, I. Properties of growing trabecular ovine bone. Part I: Mechanical and physical properties. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol. 2000, 82, 910–920. [CrossRef]
27. Willie, B.M.; Bloebaum, R.D.; Bireley, W.R.; Bachus, K.N.; Hofmann, A.A. Determining relevance of a weight-bearing ovine model for bone ingrowth assessment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2004, 69, 567–576. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Huffer, W.E.; Benedict, J.J.; Turner, A.S.; Briest, A.; Rettenmaier, R.; Springer, M.; Walboomers, X.F. Repair of sheep long bone cortical defects filled with COLLOSS, COLLOSS E, OSSAPLAST, and fresh iliac crest autograft. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part. B Appl.Biomater. 2007, 82, 460–470. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Kimmel, D.B.; Jee, W.S. A quantitative histologic study of bone turnover in young adult beagles. Anat. Rec. 1982, 203, 31–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Chugh, T.; Jain, A.K.; Jaiswal, R.K.; Mehrotra, P.; Mehrotra, R. Bone density and its importance in orthodontics. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac Res. 2013, 3, 92–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Mills, L.A.; Simpson, A.H. In vivo models of bone repair. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol. 2012, 94, 865–874. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Juodzbalys, G.; Kubilius, M. Clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy in endosseous dental implanttreatment. J. Oral Maxillofac. Res. 2013, 4, e2. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Campbell, D.I.; Duncan, W.J. The Effect of a Keratin Hydrogel Coating on Osseointegration: An Histological Comparison of Coated and Non-coated Dental Titanium Implants in an Ovine Model. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2014, 13, 159–164. [CrossRef]
34. Velasco-Ortega, E.; Ortiz-Garcia, I.; Jimenez-Guerra, A.; Monsalve-Guil, L.; Munoz-Guzon, F.; Perez, R.A.; Gil, F.J. Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3267.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Li, L.H.; Kim, H.W.; Lee, S.H.; Kong, Y.M.; Kim, H.E. Biocompatibility of titanium implants modified by microarc oxidation and hydroxyapatite coating. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2005, 73, 48–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Ergun, C.; Liu, H.; Webster, T.J.; Olcay, E.; Yilmaz, S.; Sahin, F.C. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanoparticulate calciumphosphates with higher Ca/P ratios. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2008, 85, 236–241. [CrossRef]
37. Sohn, S.H.; Jun, H.K.; Kim, C.S.; Kim, K.N.; Chung, S.M.; Shin, S.W.; Ryu, J.J.; Kim, M.K. Biological responses in osteoblast-like cell line according to thin layer hydroxyapatite coatings on anodized titanium. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006, 33, 898–911. [CrossRef]
38. Delgado-Ruiz, R.; Romanos, G. Potential Causes of Titanium Particle and Ion Release in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review.Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3585. [CrossRef]
39. Marenzi, G.; Impero, F.; Scherillo, F.; Sammartino, J.C.; Squillace, A.; Spagnuolo, G. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Titanium Dental Implant Micro-Morphology. Materials 2019, 12, 733. [CrossRef]
40. Rosenlicht, J. Advancements in soft-bone implant stability. West. Indian Dent. J. 2002, 6, 2–7.
41. Trisi, P.; Todisco, M.; Consolo, U.; Travaglini, D. High Versus Low Implant Insertion Torque: A Histologic, Histomorphometric,and Biomechanical Study in the Sheep Mandible. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2011, 26, 837–849.
42. Sanz-Martin, I.; Paeng, K.; Park, H.; Cha, J.K.; Jung, U.W.; Sanz, M. Significance of implant design on the efficacy of different peri-implantitis decontamination protocols. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 3589–3597. [CrossRef]
43. Duncan, W.J.; Lee, M.H.; Dovban, A.S.; Hendra, N.; Ershadi, S.; Rumende, H. Anodization increases early integration of Osstemimplants in sheep femurs. Ann. R. Australas. Coll. Dent. Surg. 2008, 19, 152–156. [PubMed]
44. Gottlow, J.; Barkarmo, S.; Sennerby, L. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2012, 14 (Suppl. 1), e204–e212. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Bernhardt, R.; Kuhlisch, E.; Schulz, M.C.; Eckelt, U.; Stadlinger, B. Comparison of bone-implant contact and bone-implant volume
between 2D-histological sections and 3D-SRmicroCT slices. Eur. Cell Mater. 2012, 23, 237–247. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Al-Hamdan, K.; Al-Moaber, S.H.; Junker, R.; Jansen, J.A. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: A histological and histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2011, 22, 399–405. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
英文原文依照知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)发布。
暂无评论
请选择购买类型
已成功加入购物车
