1. Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the longterm results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;16:498–504.
2. Liang YH, Li G, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The association between complete absence of posttreatment periapical lesion and quality of root canal Ḁlling. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1619–1626.
3. Ricucci D. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review. Int Endod J 1998;31:384–393.
4. Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J 1998;31:394–409.
5. Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J 1984;17:192–198.
6. Olson AK, Goerig AC, Cavataio RE, Luciano J. The ability of the radiograph to determine the location of the apical foramen. Int Endod J 1991;24:28–35.
7. Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S. A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 2006;32:624–627.
8. ElAyouti A, Weiger R, Löst C. Frequency of overinstrumentation with an acceptable radiographic working length. J Endod 2001;27:49–52.
9. Ravanshad S, Adl A, Anvar J. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of Ḁnal working length: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2010;36:1753–1756.
10. Marigo L, Gervasi GL, Somma F, Squeo G, Castagnola R. Comparison of two electronic apex locators on human cadavers. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1547–1550.
11. Hannig C, Krieger E, Dullin C, et al. Volumetry of human molars with flat panelbased volume CT in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10: 253–257.
12. Stimmelmayr M, Denk K, Erdelt K, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of four cone beam computed tomography devices using 3D implantplanning software. Int J Comput Dent 2017;20:21–34.
13. Kottoor J, Hemamalathi S, Sudha R, Velmurugan N. Maxillary second molar with 5 roots and 5 canals evaluated using cone beam computerized tomography: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:162–165.
14. Tchorz JP. 3D Endo: threedimensional endodontic treatment planning. Int J Comput Dent 2017;20:87–92.
15. Janner SF, Jeger FB, Lussi A, Bornstein MM. Precision of endodontic working length measurements: a pilot investigation comparing conebeam computed tomography scanning with standard measurement techniques. J Endod 2011;37:1046–1051.
16. Liang YH, Jiang L, Chen C, et al. The validity of conebeam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard. J Endod 2013;39:1607–1610.
17. Connert T, HülberJ M, Godt A, Löst C, ElAyouti A. Accuracy of endodontic working length determination using cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47:698–703.
18. Metska ME, Liem VM, Parsa A, Koolstra JH, Wesselink PR, Ozok A. Conebeam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study. J Endod 2014;40:1206–1209.
19. Üstün Y, Aslan T, Şekerci AE, Sağsen B. Evaluation of the Reliability of Conebeam Computed Tomography Scanning and Electronic Apex Locator Measurements in Working Length Determination of Teeth with Large Periapical Lesions. J Endod 2016;42:1334–1337.
20. Lucena C, López JM, Martín JA, Robles V, GonzálezRodríguez MP. Accuracy of working length measurement: electronic apex locator versus conebeam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47:246–256.
21. Tchorz JP, Poxleitner PJ, Stampf S, et al. The use of cone beam computed tomography to predetermine root canal lengths in molar teeth: a comparison between twodimensional and threedimensional measurements. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1129–1133.
22. Leeb J. Canal oriḀce enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation. J Endod 1983;9:463–470.
23. Schroeder KP, Walton RE, Rivera EM. Straight line access and coronal ᴀaring: effect on canal length. J Endod 2002;28:474–476.
24. de Camargo EJ, Zapata RO, Medeiros PL, et al. Inᴀuence of preᴀaring on the accuracy of length determination with four electronic apex locators. J Endod 2009;35:1300–1302.
25. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, et al. Effect of Canal Length and Curvature on Working Length Alteration with WaveOne Reciprocating Files. J Endod 2011;37:1687–1690.
26. Stoll R, UrbanKlein B, Roggendorf MJ, JablonskiMomeni A, Strauch K, Frankenberger R. Effectiveness of four electronic apex locators to determine distance from the apical foramen. Int Endod J 2010;43: 808–817.
27. Gomes S, Oliver R, Macouzet C, Mercadé M, Roig M, DuranSindreu F. In vivo evaluation of the Raypex 5 by using different irrigants. J Endod 2012;38:1075–1077.
28. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:265–273.
29. SpinNeto R, Matzen LH, Schropp L, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Factors affecting patient movement and reexposure in cone beam computed tomography examination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;119:572–578.
游客2024-03-02
WWsseerrkkccddbbff''
游客2024-03-02
WWsseerrkkccddbbff'
游客2024-03-02
WWsseerrkkccddbbff
游客2024-03-02
WWsseerrkkccddbbff