联
系
客
服
系
客
服
扫码留言
1. Saha MK, Khatri M, Saha SG, et al. Perception of acceptable range of smiles by specialists, general dentists and lay persons and evaluation of different aesthetic paradigms. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC25–ZC28.
2. Nikgoo A, Alavi K, Alavi K, Mirfazaelian A. Assessment of the golden proportion in pleasing smiles. World J Orthod 2009;10:224–228.
3. Pitel ML, Raley-Susman KM, Rubinov A. Preferences of lay persons and dental professionals regarding the recurring esthetic dental proportion. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28:102–109.
4. Sreenivasan Murthy BV, Ramani N. Evaluation of natural smile: Golden proportion, RED or golden percentage. J Conserv Dent 2008;11:16–21.
5. Sterrett JD, Oliver T, Robinson F, Fortson W, Knaak B, Russell CM. Width/ length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:153–157.
6. Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM. The faceform as a guide for the selection of maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:501–505.
7. Frush JP, Fischer RD. How dentogenic restorations interpret the sex factor. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:160–172.
8. Sellen PN, Jagger DC, Harrison A. Methods used to select artificial anterior teeth for the edentulous patient: A historical overview. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:51–58.
9. Seluk LW, Brodbelt RH, Walker GF. A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:139–145.
10. Mack MR. Vertical dimension: A dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:478–485.
11. Mack MR. Facially generated occlusal vertical dimension. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1997;18:1183–1186.
12. Johnston DJ, Hunt O, Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson M, Hepper P. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:349–354.
13. Knight H, Keith O. Ranking facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2005;27: 340–348.
14. Sabri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod 2005;39: 155–167.
15. Prendergast, Peter M. Facial proportions. In: Erian A, Shiffman MA (eds). Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation. Cambridge: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012:15–22.
16. Brown M, Guyuron B. Redefining the ideal nasolabial angle: Part 2. Expert analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132: e221–e225.
17. Harris R, Nagarkar P, Amirlak B. Varied definitions of nasolabial angle: searching for consensus among rhinoplasty surgeons and an algorithm for selecting the ideal method. Plast Reconstr Glob Open 2016;4:e752.
18. Armijo BS, Brown M, Guyuron B. Defining the ideal nasolabial angle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:759–764.
19. Drummond S, Capelli J Jr. Incisor display during speech and smile: Age and gender correlations. Angle Orthod 2016; 86:631–637.
20. Penna V, Stark GB, Eisenhardt SU, Bannasch H, Iblher N. The aging lip: A comparative histological analysis of age-related changes in the upper lip complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124:624–628.
21. Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The anatomy and clinical implications of perioral submuscular fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124:266–271.
22. Iblher N, Stark GB, Penna V. The aging perioral region: Do we really know what is happening? J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16:581–585.
23. Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY, Patel RD, Campagni WV, Brudvik JS. The influence of upper lip length and lip mobility on maxillary incisal exposure. Am J Esthet Dent 2012;2:116–125.
24. Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve: Prevalence, measurement of its length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone beam CT imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1022–1030.
25. Brånemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberhe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modem Brånemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:227–231.
26. Maló P, Rangbert B, Nobre M. “All-onfour” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: A retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(suppl 1):s2–s9.
27. Maló P, Rangbert B, Nobre M. “All-onfour” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: A 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(suppl 1):s88–s94.
28. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:39–49.
29. Maló P, de ArAraujo Nobre M, Rangbert B. Implants placed in immediate function in periodontally compromised sites: A five-year retrospective and oneyear prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(suppl):s86–s95.
30. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangbert B, Lindström H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:405–414.
31. Parel SM, Phillips WR. A risk assessment treatment planning protocol for the four implant immediately loaded maxilla: Preliminary findings. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:359–366.
32. Scala R, Cucchi A, Ghensi P, Vartolo F. Clinical evaluation of satisfaction in patients rehabilitated with an immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis: A controlled prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:911–919.
33. Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: Aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:374–383.
34. Pressa JE, Zadoo VP, Mutimer KL, et al. Relative maxillary retrusion as a natural consequence of aging: Combining skeletal and soft tissue changes into an integrated model of midfacial aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:205–212. 35. Shaw RB Jr, Kahn DM. Aging of the midface bony elements: A three dimensional CT study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119:675–681
暂无评论
请选择购买类型
已成功加入购物车
